First one...
Saturday, March 19, 2005
Pilli Blogging
First one...
Friday, March 18, 2005
Thursday, March 17, 2005
Back home
Francisco
Friday, March 11, 2005
Monday, March 07, 2005
Packing and DC
Maybe Julie will blog while I'm gone... but that reminds me I was suppose to tap Irma for a society... oh well
Sunday, March 06, 2005
New cosas
Saturday, March 05, 2005
Friday, March 04, 2005
A battle won
Yale University Follows Harvard's Lead to Lure Poorer Students
March 3 (Bloomberg) -- Yale University President Richard Levin said he will follow Harvard's lead and reduce costs for lower-income students, a week after Yale students closed the admissions office to protest financial-aid policies.
``Sometimes we innovate, and sometimes we bow to best practices,'' Levin, 57, said in an interview from the New Haven, Connecticut school. ``We have seen Harvard being pretty successful with their attempt to reach out and become more accessible.''
Levin said Yale was influenced by Harvard University's program of recruiting and easing costs for students whose families earn between $40,000 and $60,000 a year. The move comes as other schools, including the University of Virginia in Charlottesville and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, provide more financial aid to low-income students.
Yale will spend about $3 million a year to help poorer students, saving their families an average of $2,500 annually, Levin said. As it recruits lower-income students, Yale will eliminate parental contributions for families earning under $45,000 a year, and reduce payments from those making less than $60,000.
Harvard
Harvard, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, changed its aid policies last year and next month will decide who qualifies for the program. Dean of Admissions William Fitzsimmons said that applications for the class of 2009 rose 15 percent in part because of the new efforts.
``We are really pleased to learn about the changes Yale made,'' Fitzsimmons said in a phone interview yesterday. ``Any time this kind of a message comes out from the most competitive institutions, it helps all of the colleges and sends a wonderful message of hope.''
Fifteen students held a sit-in at Yale's admissions office on Feb. 24, while 150 others outside called on Levin to ease costs for students on financial aid. The annual cost of attending Yale is about $41,470.
Levin said the sit-in came after he addressed students at a forum on financial aid and listened to their concerns.
``This is a strong signal, an advertising message, that Yale is affordable,'' Levin said of the new financial-aid program.
Endowments
Douglas Bennett, president of Earlham College in Richmond, Indiana, said Yale's move does little to help make higher education accessible and affordable to all students.
``Only a small handful of colleges and universities have endowments that allow them to do what Yale is doing,'' said Bennett, chairman of the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities in Washington, D.C.
``The real battle over access to higher education for students from low-income families is being waged in Washington D.C., where the Congress is considering whether to increase Pell Grants and whether to fully fund all the federal financial aid programs for low-income students,'' Bennett said.
Yale has a $12.8 billion endowment. Levin said the university will pay for the initiative using savings achieved in the last year through administrative reductions. About 42 percent of Yale students qualify for financial aid.
Some students had complained to Levin that they must take out large loans to pay for the costs not covered by aid. Princeton University in New Jersey and Amherst College in Massachusetts already have programs to protect students from debt, said Amherst President Anthony Marx.
Ensuring Access
``Amherst, Harvard and Yale and schools like them recognize that we are not and have not been doing enough to ensure access to the best universities and colleges in the land regardless of ability to pay,'' Marx said. ``There are still lots of really smart kids from poor backgrounds not applying to these schools because they think they can't afford it.''
At the nation's most selective colleges and universities, only 3 percent of students come from families in the lowest 25 percent of income. About 75 are from families in the top 25 percent, Harvard President Lawrence Summers said last year.
Levin said 15 to 17 percent of Yale's 5,240 undergraduates come from low-income families. Like Harvard, Yale will recruit students from rural areas of the U.S., and it will pay for one trip home each year for international students who are on financial aid. Yale expects its financial aid budget to grow to more than $52 million for 2005-06, Levin said.
``Yale is making a serious commitment to remaining competitive on low-income financial aid,'' said Andrew Cedar, 20, president of Yale College Council, the student government.
Tom Mortenson, an education consultant, said the initiative may not benefit enough students.
``Yale has a very long way to go to enroll an average share of already underrepresented population in higher education,'' he said.
Last year, Yale had its most selective year ever, with 19,682 applicants. Only 9.9 percent of applicants were admitted, the lowest rate in the school's 303-year history. This year, applications are down 1.2 percent, admissions director Richard Shaw told the Yale Daily News.
At Harvard, a record 22,717 students vied for about 1,650 spots last year, Fitzsimmons said.
Sucky Day
Saturday, February 12, 2005
New Years.....
But I will try every morning when I get back from my job to post even some inate thing....status of my next major project which is finishing my essay that I must do. But we'll see.
Much love and volvere.
Francisco
Wednesday, February 02, 2005
Tuesday, November 23, 2004
Pre-Thanksgiving
Friday, November 05, 2004
We have only begun to fight!
I feel that first and foremost the Left needs to engage in the cultural war. Otherwise all is lost. It took 40 years to establish this control for the right, their game is tight no doubt about it. But in less than 2 years the dormant heart and soul of the left has reawaken and I feel is ready to fight. Crap the election showed we can form groups and networks quicker and more flexible than the Conservatives. We had a war time president running for his job. The Light and Truth will prevail, maybe god wanted the world to let bush see that light and truth first hand. Gays should be allowed to be married as long as they don't destroy society at the same time. Red states have the highest rates of divorce in our great country and guess what the one state that allows gay unions is the lowest. Morals are about actions not about repetitive slogans. The Morals and values or this country have been verbally hijacked but they need to be retaken. More than anything I want to destroy Conservatives, the movement the organizations and everything associated with it, except of course religion but I only say that because people may have equated the two.. that equation took 20 years to bear fruit, out country is 228 years old before that religion was something out country shared and allowed its people to practice and alter. Religion is at the heart of the character of our nation but our nation's character was not imprinted or dictated to us by our founders for good reason. I do not want to fight religion but its use as compass toward a more perfect union.
Since we did not begin this war, (yes liberals helped change institutions to allow for more choice and inclusion, not the outlawing of those original ideas - ie segregation was outlawed not personal racism) conservatives have been unwilling to compromise our culture, its their way or get the fuck out of the country/go to Europe, turn French. I am sorry that our principles as open minded individuals allowed the radicals to continue existing for that we must obliterate and untie religion for this unholy bond. This crippling and collapse of the right is necessary not only for the liberal agenda to continue but also for the principles of this enlightened country to reign outward the world. That is why the world is sadden by our choice as a country, not because they hate us but because they saw the war from afar we as liberal were too close to the action to see the forest closing in around us. Our live and let live attitude was seen as weakness and used to get their troops closer to heart of our country than we could imagine. So here we are. Will we fight for our rights or will the right use god to control this country? Don't forget the last time religion ruled unabided was the DARK AGES.





